Search: Site   Web
The Pulpit ~

Author Archive

Dobson, others sign declaration as “call of Christian conscience”

November 20th, 2009, 5:25 pm by Mark Barna

Focus on the Family founder James Dobson, 15 Roman Catholic bishops, and other Christian leaders have signed a declaration today that underscores their being against gay marriage and abortion, the Associated Press reports.

The declaration also takes shots at the Obama Administration and the federal healthcare proposal.

The document is called “The Manhattan Declaration: A Call to Christian Conscience.”

Predictably, President Barack Obama gets hammered in the declaration. “The present administration is led and staffed by those who want to make abortions legal at any stage of fetal development, and who want to provide abortions at tax payers expense,” AP reports the declaration saying.

These Christian conservative declarations have become somewhat commonplace. Do you think they make any real difference to anyone? Is this preaching to the choir? Please explain below.

Creator of conservative Bible: “We are peeling away the political bias”

November 20th, 2009, 4:50 pm by Mark Barna

In my Nov. 22 Pulpit column at Gazette.com, I write about the Conservative Bible Project that’s being created wiki-style at www.conservapedia.com, a right wing conservative Christian Web site that’s gotten tens of millions of hits since its founding byNew Jersey resident Andrew Schlafly in 2006.

"Forgive them, Father, for ... oops, scratch that"

"Forgive them, Father, for ... oops, scratch that"

The project basically entails changing the King James Version of the Bible to reflect today’s right-wing Christian conservatism. This is done through a wiki program in which online viewers can change Bible passages. But it’s not quite so democratic as it seems. Schlafly and Terry Hurlbut, both from New Jersey, decide what changes are displayed in the wiki conservative Bible. The most controversial edits of the Bible by the team are the elimination of some of the passages in which Jesus expresses forgiveness.

Below are edited excerpts of parts of my phone interviews with these gentlemen.

ANDY SCHLAFLY, 48, IS A NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY AND CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN. HE HAS NO FORMAL TRAINING IN GREEK OR HEBREW TRANSLATION, THOUGH HE SAYS HE HAS STUDIED “THE GREEK BIBLE.”

MARK BARNA: “You said you got the idea for your wiki-style Conservapedia.com from Wikipedia?”

SCHLAFLY: “Wikipedia is bias. They are completely intolerant of anything that is critical or reveals a flaw in evolution. That fact that everything is BCE or CE is another example (of Christian bashing). There’s a lot of anti-American bias on Wikipedia.”

“Wikipeda becomes mob rule, dominated by liberals.”

BARNA: “What’s wrong with modern Bible translations?”

SCHLAFLY: “They have a lot of pervasive and pernicious liberalization. About 90 percent of (biblical) scholars are liberal.”

BARNA: “And you say liberals add allusions to socialism, anti-Americanism, gender-neutral language and is anti-capitalism. Yet you also say ‘liberals’ highlight the passages in the Bible about forgiveness, such as Jesus forgiving people as he hung on the cross, and his forgiving the adulteress whom the mob wanted to stone. What is so wrong with forgiveness?”

SCHLAFLY: “It suggests (in the scenes) forgiveness without repentance. It opens the door and promotes sin. Opens the door to atheism…waters down hell, denies hell, opens the door to the growth of atheism…Jesus talked more about hell than heaven… .”

“Forgiving adulteress woman … The basic error is it teaches people can do what they want and they will be forgiven even if they don’t repent. (The forgiveness scene of the adulterous) is historical nonsense. They didn’t stone women. They strangled them. Liberals love it because they use it to argue against capital punishment.”

BARNA: “You reject those passages as well because you follow what modern scholars have learned  — that neither of those forgiveness scenes are in early Bible manuscripts.

SCHLAFLY: “We respect the original intent (of Bible authors). We are pealing away the political bias. We are purifying the Bible.”

TERRY HURLBUT, 51, IS THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER AND CHAIRMAN OF COMMITTEE TRANSLATIONS AT THE CONSERVATIVE BIBLE PROJECT. HURLBUT STUDIED LATIN IN HIGH SCHOOL, HE SAID, AND GREEK FOR A YEAR AT A CHURCH. HE LIVES IN NEW JERSEY AND IS A CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVE.  HE SAYS HE’S THE CHIEF TRANSLATOR OF GENESIS, REVELATION, MATTHEW, MARK, JUDE AND OTHER BOOKS IN THE CONSERVATIVE BIBLE.

BARNA: What qualifies you to translate the Bible?

HURLBUT: [Hurlbut states the above and adds he's studied the Bible on his own for 19 years.] “I have enough facility in ancient Hebrew to understand its grammatical constructs. I will match my personal qualifications against 98 percent of critics I’ve seen.”

BARNA: “Some say you are flavoring your Bible translation with conservative bias.”

HURLBUT: “We derive our value system from the Bible. We are not the ones trying to put something into the Bible. We see this was done in the New International Version. We derive our values from the Bible and are trying to elucidate them — find what the original scribes saw and felt.”

BARNA: “You say liberals use the money changer scene to argue that Jesus was against capitalism.”

HURLBUT: “I deny that he was making a statement against commercialism. This is not against capitalism…. . Also, no socialism. In Acts 4 and 5, the apostles set up a communal economy … but it’s not socialism. They were anticipating getting scattered. It was a temporary arrangement, entirely voluntary and did not involve the government at all. The people citing that’s socialism, they take their ideological scissors and cut things out of the Bible all the time. They have misconstrued the circumstances under which this communal arrangement was made.”

BARNA: “You’ve translated Revelation where there is language about the Antichrist. Is President Barack Obama the Antichrist?”

HURLBUT: “I am not prepared to say that… . Obama is someone who accepts things close to divine honors, but whether he is the beast from the sea … the false prophet will have to be out of Jewish extraction. I don’t deny Barack Obama could be The One…. [Hurlbut begins to ramble] Those of us who genuinely believe in Christ … will suddenly disappear … one minute will be driving in a car, the next minute the (car) will be driver-less.”

BARNA: “You discount the scenes of Jesus forgiving the adulterous and the multitude from the cross.”

HURLBUT: “This is something Jesus did not mean to say, that adultery was not a serious offense… . If we want the Bible, we want something that is accurate. [Hurlbut goes on to impugn Jesus' words, "Forgive them, Father, for they know not what they do."] When they say they don’t know what they are doing, someone might use that to mean they literally do not know why they set up a man to be executed.”

SAMPLE TRANSLATION COMPARISONS, REVELATION, CHAPTER 3: 1-2:

KING JAMES BIBLE: “I know thy works, that thou hast a name that thou livest and art dead. Be watchful and strengthen the things that remain, that are ready to die.”

CONSERVATIVE BIBLE: “I know your deeds, you have a reputation for being alive and you are dead. Get with the program, strengthen what you have left and is about to die. I have not found your works satisfactory before God.”

NYU professor gets pushback over Forbes Muslim article

November 20th, 2009, 1:50 pm by Mark Barna

On Nov. 16, Tunku Varadaragjan wrote an essay for Forbes.com called “Going Muslim.” In it he rants against Islam in the wake of the shooting at Fort Hood by a U.S. Army doctor who is Muslim.

Varadaragjan writes at one point: “Must we continue to be neutral in handling all people from different groups even though we know that there are differential risks posed by people of one group? The problem here is a heightened version of the airport security problem, where we check all people — including Chinese grandmothers — regardless of risk profiles. But can we afford that on a grand, national scale?”

Haroon Moghul, an  NYU philosophy professor who also happens to be Muslim, has written an interesting essay in which he takes Varadarajan to task, You can read the essay here.

Couch potatoes with a Christian bent unite

November 19th, 2009, 4:42 pm by Mark Barna

Have you ever said to yourself on Sunday morning that I’d really like to hear a good sermon but don’t feel like driving to a church?

Now you don’t have to.

Online churches are becoming more popular. They are convenient, and if you want a snack during a sermon, all you have to do is get up and head to the fridge.

But online churches also have critics, who say they lack community and that online sacraments like Communion  just don’t have the same flavor as they do when experienced in person.

You can read for about online churches from this CNN story here.

What do you think of online churches? A fad? The wave of the future?

Please comment below.

The Bible as told by stars

November 19th, 2009, 4:31 pm by Mark Barna

Celebrities are showing their godly side in a new audio Bible released in October. The audio Bible is 98 hours on 79 CDs. It’s available at Christian bookstores, as well as at secular retailers like Barnes & Noble and Borders.

Michael York

Michael York

Stars supplying their voices include Jim Caviezel (Jesus), Malcolm McDowell (King Solomon), Richard Dreyfus (Moses), Louise Gossett Jr. (Apostle John), Jason Alexander (Joseph, husband of Mary) and Luke Perry (Judas).

Michael York logs in the most time  on the CDs as the Bible’s narrator.

Interview with co-author of “One Month to Live” bestselling book

November 13th, 2009, 6:41 pm by Mark Barna

Kerry and Chris Shook are co-pastors at the 17,000-member Woodlands Church near Houston, Texas. In 2008 they published a book called “One Month to Live: Thirty Days to a No-Regrets Life,” which ended up on the New York Times Bestseller List.

The book has spawned a movement in Christian circles, as more than 2,200 churches in America have created study groups around it.

In Sunday’s paper (Nov. 15), I take a look at the Shooks’ book and a Colorado Springs church that is teaching the “One Month to Live” program this month.

Below is my edited interview with Kerry Shook.

 

BARNA: How did you formulate One Month to Live?

KERRY SHOOK: 30 days to live, in part came out  of our  experience in ministry. Specifically, the time  that Chris and I have been privileged to spend with many people as they faced the imminent end of their lives on earth. While many of them struggle through stages of grief (shock, denial, bargaining, guilt, anger, depression, acceptance) most of them make radical changes as a result of their awareness of their terminal conditions. They take  the opportunity  to say what they really feel and do what they really want. They ask for forgiveness and forgive others. They go beyond themselves and reach out to those they love. They seem to gain a new clarity about their priorities. So, over the years of watching others live out their last days, we began to ask ourselves, Why can’t all of us live more like we’re dying? Isn’t that how we were meant to live in the first place? To discover what we’re made for and to utilize our unique gifts in the limited amount of time we’re given? So at a staff retreat a couple of years ago we tried a little experiment and asked our team members this question: If you knew you had one month to live, how would you live differently?  We gave everyone a journal and challenged them to live the next thirty days as if they were their last and to write down what happened. At the end of the thirty days, we all had a greater clarity of purpose and renewed passion for the things that really matter.

 

BARNA: What do you hope people get out of the program?

SHOOK: My hope and prayer is that people will think seriously about what they want most out of life and what keeps them from pursuing it. I hope they will embrace the fact that someday their life will come to an end so they will begin to live each day more fully. We are all eventually reduced to a date of birth, a dash, and then a date of death. You get to choose how you are going to spend that little dash of time between the two dates of your earthly existence. Just as Chris and I have found greater joy in the everyday things like taking our children to school, going to all their games or having breakfast together every morning we are finding many other people who are finding joy and happiness in the little things.  

 

BARNA: After interviewing a church leader involved, it seems the program is not so much living your last 30 days, but ramping up your life by beginning good habits that you can practice the rest of your life. True?

SHOOK: Some people live the 30 days as if they are their last and some just use it as a starting point for change. It’s different for everyone. Last year we even had some people substitute taking the challenge for making News Years resolutions enjoying the sense of urgency it brings to making real change. Chris and I patterned the challenge after four principles that we believe characterized Jesus’ life. That is: live passionately, love completely, learn humbly and leave boldly. You can’t do all that in a month but its a start and you begin to change the rest of your life by doing things that really matter.    

 

For more information on One Month to Live, call 866-977-6685 or go to www.OneMonthtoLive.com

Pastors Kerry and Chris Shook

Pastors Kerry and Chris Shook

Haggard’s “accountability team”

November 13th, 2009, 6:37 pm by Mark Barna

Many have criticized Ted Haggard for quitting the restoration program he was assigned to take by New Life Church following his sex scandal in 2006 that led to his forced resignation as senior pastor of New Life.

Some have speculated that Haggard has cut himself  loose from any pastoral oversight.

But Haggard told me today that is not the case. For the past several months, five pastors, all chosen by Haggard, of U.S. evangelical nondenominational churches  have helped guide his spiritual walk.

Haggard calls the five his ”accountability team.”

He says the problem with the restoration team was that it was “corporate” whereas the accountability team is “personal and relational.”

“I’ll never be in a situation where I can’t tell the accountability team my mind or heart,” Haggard told me.

Haggard said that when he was with New Life, he sought counsel with some church officials, but their answers left him flat. “They wanted me to memorize Romans Chapter 6 and do extra church work,” Haggard said. He feels he’s gotten better insight from his accountability team.

Haggard also said if his gatherings take off – and today he seemed pretty confident that they will — you won’t see him switch to suit and tie, as he wore at New Life. “I’ll be casual, in blue jeans, and people can interrupt me and ask questions,” Haggard  said.

New Life, he said, was a ”20th century” format. Any new-church project he’s part of will be “21st century.”

Does Ted Haggard deserve a second chance?

November 13th, 2009, 5:42 pm by Mark Barna

In my Nov. 15 Pulpit column, which you can read at www.gazette.com, several people who have worked with Haggard talk about why we should give the founder of New Life Church a second chance.

Randy Welsch was the lead elder at New Life Church in Colorado Springs

Haggard

Haggard

 at the time Ted Haggard resigned in Nov. 2006 in the wake of a sex scandal. Welsch is no longer part of New Life.

Below is my edited excerpt of my interview with Welsch.

MARK BARNA: “How has Haggard changed since the scandal three years ago?”

RANDY WELSCH: “My experience with him is that he is much more compassionate and cares about people more than he ever has. It’s done a good work in him. He is more transparent. He is much more compassionate. He listens to input in a way I never saw of him before.”

“Ted confessed his sin. He’s repented of his sin. What else should he do?”

“Why do we as Christians not give people a second chance? The story of the Bible is a story of redemption. The Lord wants us to be truly loving, and loving people who are struggling.”

The Rev. Bob Wentz worked with Haggard at the National Association of Evangelicals from 2003 to 2005. Wentz has been a pastor for more than 30 years.

BARNA: “Will Haggard start a formal church?”

BOB WENTZ: “When you have spent your life teaching the word of God, and then suddenly you are not doing it, you miss it. I would think anyone who has been a pastor for 20 years and was successful, longs to continue to do that.”

BARNA: “Ted and Gayle are doing pretty well giving talks at churches across the country. Why not just keep doing that?”

WENTZ: “That’s got a shelf life on it. You can only repent for so long.”

BARNA: “You say you are still in contact with Haggard, having lunch with him now and then, but not part of his inner circle. From your vantage point, how would you say Haggard has changed?”

WENTZ: “He was always in motion. A type Double A personality, the energizing bunny type of guy. Now he’s more reflective and thoughtful. Suffering either softens people or hardens them.”

“I sense a very different Ted than three years ago. God has put him on the anvil and he has taken some mighty blows and knocked away some big issues.”

BARNA: “Why do so many people have trouble accepting that Haggard may have conquered his demons ?”

WENTZ: “Some people, it seems, like to drag other people down, because it makes them feel better about themselves. People who rejoice in Ted’s failure, enjoy rubbing his nose in it, do it out of a sense of arrogance. …

“But part of this is the Pentecostal subcuture. There, you don’t deal with psychological issues. Everything is treated as an issue of sin. Not until (the scandal) became exposed and he was discredited, did Ted go and get the psychological help he needed. When you are sexually molested, there is compulsion, revulsion going on at the same time … But in Pentecostal circles, psychology has been the boogie man.”

BARNA: In the Bible, there are many stories of people embroiled in sin, but somehow end up working for the glory of God.

WENTZ: “Not only are they transformed, we also find evidence of people transformed in terms of lifestyle. You read the Bible, you read about the people who are flawed. The Bible is not a story of what should have happened, but what did happen. You find accounts where lives are a mess, and sometimes they get it back and sometimes they don’t. The Bible is extremely honest. We don’t always see that. We idealize and sanitize it instead.”

Rev. Sun Myung Moon turning church over to children

November 13th, 2009, 11:10 am by Mark Barna

The Rev. Sun Myung Moon, founder of the Unification Church, say he is giving up control of his church to his four adult children, according to the Associated Press.

Moon’s three sons, who are ages 30, 39 and 40, will oversee the church’s

Rev. Moon

Rev. Moon

 theological organizations and business interests, AP reports.

Who is a Jew? The question arises in a British court

November 13th, 2009, 9:42 am by Mark Barna

Who is a Jew?

Britain’s Supreme Court will be deciding that in the near future.image11

The case sprung from a Jewish boy being refused admittance to a Jewish school even though his parents are Jewish,  but not orthodox, according to the New York Times story.

“This is potentially the biggest case in the British Jewish community’s modern history,” Stephen Pollard, editor of the Jewish Chronicle newspaper in London, told the New York Times. “It speaks directly to the right of the state to intervene in how a religion operates.”

You can read the full story here.

How would you define a Jew?

ADVERTISEMENT 
ADVERTISEMENT 
  • Archives

  • Categories

powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site